Vol. 15 No. 4 (2024):
Review Article

Regional Governance Challenges in Implementing EU Smart Specialization Policy: A Critical Review

Eristian Wibisono
University of Pécs; Faculty of Business and Economics, Pécs, Hungary
PRISMA flow diagram

Published 2024-12-09

Keywords

  • regional governance,
  • challenges,
  • innovation policy,
  • smart specialization,
  • European Union

How to Cite

Wibisono, Eristian. 2024. “Regional Governance Challenges in Implementing EU Smart Specialization Policy: A Critical Review”. European Journal of Geography 15 (4):281-92. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.wib.15.4.281.292.
Received 2024-08-21
Accepted 2024-12-09
Published 2024-12-09

Abstract

This review paper has three main objectives: first, to examine the governance challenges associated with the implementation of smart specialization policies in different EU regions; second, to examine the governance challenges faced by weaker regions; and third, to explore specific governance approaches to address these challenges. A systematic literature review was conducted to analyze the most relevant studies, extract critical findings, and derive lessons and practical policy recommendations. The review identified two key challenges in the governance of smart specialization policies, namely stakeholder engagement and institutional readiness. These challenges are common in most EU regions and are more critical in weaker regions. Further analysis reveals specific governance approaches that can address these challenges, with some literature explicitly linking these approaches to multilevel governance. Given the gaps identified in the existing literature, this paper aims to lay the groundwork for future research to explore these governance approaches in the context of smart specialization policies in EU regions and, more specifically, in weaker regions.

Highlights

  • Implementing smart specialization in EU regions remains challenging.
  • Stakeholder engagement and institutional readiness are crucial for S3 governance.
  • A more specific approach to S3 governance is highly encouraged.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. AlMalki, H. A., & Durugbo, C. M. (2023). Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model. Man-agement Review Quarterly, 73(2), 731–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00259-8
  2. Aranguren, M. J., Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Wilson, J. R. (2019). Governance of the territorial entrepreneurial discovery process: looking under the bonnet of RIS3. Regional Studies, 53(4), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1462484
  3. Asheim, B. T. (2019). Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innova-tive regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001
  4. Barzotto, M., Corradini, C., Fai, F., Labory, S., & ... (2020). Smart specialisation, Industry 4.0 and lagging regions: some directions for policy. Re-gional Studies …. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21681376.2020.1803124
  5. Braunschweiger, D., & Pütz, M. (2021). Climate adaptation in practice: How mainstreaming strategies matter for policy integration. Environmen-tal Policy and Governance, 31(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1936
  6. Carayannis, E. G., & Grigoroudis, E. (2023). Toward a New Impact Assessment Approach of Smart Specialization Strategies Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3305649
  7. Carayannis, E. G., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2017). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 460–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9433-8
  8. Chrysomallidis, C., & Tsakanikas, A. (2017). The implementation of smart specialization strategy in Greece: Re-balancing governance between the central state and the regions. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 9(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12095
  9. Cvijanović, V., Griniece, E., Gulyás, O., Reid, A., & Varga, H. (2020). Stakeholder engagement through entrepreneurial discovery? Lessons from countries and regions in Central and Eastern Europe. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1794273
  10. D’Adda, D., Iacobucci, D., & Perugini, F. (2022). Smart Specialisation Strategy in practice: have regions changed the allocation of Structural Funds? Regional Studies, 56(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1890326
  11. Di Cataldo, M., Monastiriotis, V., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2022). How ‘smart’ are smart specialization strategies? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(5), 1272–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13156
  12. Estensoro, M., & Larrea, M. (2016). Overcoming policy making problems in smart specialization strategies: engaging subregional governments. European Planning Studies, 24(7), 1319–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1174670
  13. Estensoro, M., & Larrea, M. (2023). Facilitation of Entrepreneurial Discovery Processes by Policymakers: an Actionable Definition of Roles and Challenges. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 1321–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00906-1
  14. Foray, D. (2018). Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy-a case study on the emergence of new policy practices. In-dustrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty030
  15. Foray, D., McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization and European regional development policy. Oxford handbook of local competitiveness, 458-480. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199993307.001.0001
  16. Ghinoi, S., Steiner, B., Makkonen, T., & Hassink, R. (2021). Smart Specialisation strategies on the periphery: a data-triangulation approach to governance issues and practices. Regional Studies, 55(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1791321
  17. Glückler, J., & Bathelt, H. (2017). Institutional context and innovation. In The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 121–137). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00015
  18. González-López, M. (2019). Understanding policy learning in regional innovation policies: lessons from the Galician case. Innovation: The Euro-pean Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1519780
  19. Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1638–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892
  20. Hanssen, G. S., Mydske, P. K., & Dahle, E. (2013). Multi-level coordination of climate change adaptation: by national hierarchical steering or by regional network governance? Local Environment, 18(8), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.738657
  21. Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
  22. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2021). Multilevel governance and the coordination dilemma. In A Research Agenda for Multilevel Governance (pp. 19–36). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908374.00008
  23. Hovik, S., & Hanssen, G. S. (2015). The impact of network management and complexity on multi‐level coordination. Public Administration, 93(2), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12135
  24. Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M., Huitema, D., Jordan, A., & Newig, J. (2017). Experiments in climate governance–A systematic review of research on ener-gy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027
  25. Knudsen, J. P., Schulze-Krogh, A. C., & Normann, R. (2020). Smart Specialisation—Norwegian Adoptions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(4), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00610-7
  26. Kroll, H. (2019). Eye to eye with the innovation paradox: why smart specialization is no simple solution to policy design. European Planning Stud-ies, 27(5), 932–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1577363
  27. Laranja, M. (2022). Translating Smart Specialisation and entrepreneurial discovery into a process-oriented policy. Regional Studies, 56(5), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1959028
  28. Morgan, K. (2017). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16645106
  29. Morgan, K., & Marques, P. (2019). The public animateur: Mission-led innovation and the “smart state” in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz002
  30. Papamichail, G., Rosiello, A., & Wield, D. (2023). Addressing public policy implementation challenges in lagging regions through the analytical lens of smart specialisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(1), 356-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00874-y
  31. Pugh, R. (2018). Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions. Environ-ment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417717069
  32. Ranga, M. (2018). Smart specialization as a strategy to develop early-stage regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 26(11), 2125–2146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1530149
  33. Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2015). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Exchange, 117–158. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
  34. Rehfeld, D., & Terstriep, J. (2019). Regional governance in North Rhine-Westphalia–lessons for smart specialisation strategies? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1520629
  35. Roman, M., & Fellnhofer, K. (2022). Facilitating the participation of civil society in regional planning: Implementing quadruple helix model in Finn-ish regions. Land Use Policy, 112, 105864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105864
  36. Ruhrmann, H., Fritsch, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2022). Synergy and policy-making in German innovation systems: Smart Specialisation Strategies at national, regional, local levels? Regional Studies, 56(9), 1468–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1872780
  37. Sherman, M. H., & Ford, J. (2014). Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: an evaluation of projects in developing nations. Climate Policy, 14(3), 417–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.859501
  38. Sörvik, J., Teräs, J., Dubois, A., & Pertoldi, M. (2019). Smart Specialisation in sparsely populated areas: challenges, opportunities and new open-ings. Regional Studies, 53(7), 1070–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1530752
  39. Švarc, J., & Dabić, M. (2021). Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries. Technology in Society, 67, 101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101705
  40. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
  41. Ulnicane, I., Knight, W., Leach, T., Stahl, B. C., & Wanjiku, W.-G. (2021). Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: insights from AI policy. Policy and Society, 40(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800
  42. Wibisono, E. (2022a). Multilevel governance and Smart Specialization in EU regions: an evidence-based critical review. European Journal of Gov-ernment and Economics, 11(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2022.11.2.9004
  43. Wibisono, E. (2022b). Smart Specialisation in less-developed regions of the European Union: A Systematic Literature Review. REGION, 9(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i2.388