Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): (Regular Issue in Progress)
Review Article

Utilisation of Concept Maps in Geography Education Research: A Systematic Review

Vanda Pivarníková
Department of Geography, Faculty of Education, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
Example of a non-hierarchical concept map on the topic of ‘causes of climate change’ created by the author in CmapTools, based on the text available on the European Commission (n.d.) website
Categories

Published 2025-05-11

Keywords

  • concept maps,
  • geography education,
  • systematic review,
  • geography students,
  • meaningful learning,
  • systems thinking
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Pivarníková, Vanda. 2025. “Utilisation of Concept Maps in Geography Education Research: A Systematic Review”. European Journal of Geography 16 (2):169-83. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.v.piv.16.2.169.183.
Received 2025-02-15
Accepted 2025-05-10
Published 2025-05-11

Abstract

Concept maps are graphical representations of students’ knowledge and understanding, used for the development of meaningful learning. In geographical education, they can support the visualisation of processes among Earth systems and the development of systems thinking. This systematic review examines 40 empirical studies (2003–2023), written in English and found in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The aim of the literature review was to analyse and categorise the most common uses of concept maps in geography education research, focusing on the research, interaction and application issues of concept maps in relation to geography and the students creating them. The results show that concept maps were predominantly used as an assessment tool to reveal conceptual changes post-intervention. The most frequently mapped topic was climate change and other human–environment interactions. Concept maps were primarily used to study general pedagogical problems, less to explicitly research geographical education. This review highlights the role of concept maps in geography education, and their potential and limitations in efficient implementation.

Highlights:

● Using concept maps as a learning tool can help students develop systems and relational thinking skills.
● Concept map use can help teachers detect misconceptions and conceptual changes in student learning.
● Initial training in concept mapping and continuous feedback are major conditions for its effective use and the gain in possible benefits for geography students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Åhlberg, M., & Ahoranta, V. (2002). Two improved educational theory based tools to monitor and promote quality of geographical education and learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040208667475
  2. Akbaş, Y., & Gençtürk, E. (2011). The effect of conceptual change approach to eliminate 9th Grade high school students’ misconceptions about air pressure. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 2217-2222. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ962696.pdf
  3. Allen, C. D., & Barbour, J. M. (2016). Geography by Rail®: A new twist on a romantic concept. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(4), 479-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1201801
  4. Allen, C. D., & Lukinbeal, C. (2011). Practicing physical geography: An actor-network view of physical geography exemplified by the rock art stabil-ity index. Progress in Physical Geography, 35(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133310364929
  5. Anohina-Naumeca, A. (2024). Concept map-based formative assessment of students’ structural knowledge. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  6. Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2005.) Development of system thinking skills in the context of Earth system education. Journal of Research in Sci-ence Teaching, 42(5), 518-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
  7. Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orpaz, I. (2010). The “Life at the Poles” study unit: Developing junior high school students’ ability to recognize the relations between Earth systems. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 525-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9132-2
  8. Bendl, T., Marada, M., & Krajňáková, L. (2024). Breaking down the complexity of geographical thinking: A European perspective. Geography, 109(3), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2024.2395178
  9. Bulunuz, N., & Jerrett, O. S. (2010). Understanding of Earth and space science concepts: Strategies for concept-building in elementary teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 109(5), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18092.x
  10. Bustin, R. (2019). Geography education’s potential and the capability approach: Geocapabilities and schools. Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Campelo, L. F., & Piconez, S. V. C. (2018). Concept mapping in Geography: A review of full papers in the area. Concept mapping: Renewing learn-ing and thinking. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concept Mapping, Medellín, Colombia 2018. https://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc2018papers/cmc2018-p9.pdf
  12. Cañas, A. J., Reiska, P., & Shvaikovsky, O. (2023). Improving learning and understanding through concept mapping. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.021
  13. Chang, C.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-G. (2022). Concept mapping in technology-supported K-12 education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications from 2001 to 2020. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(7), 1637-1662. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211073
  14. Chang, C.-C., Liu G.-Y., Chen, K. J., Huang, C.-H., Lai, Y.-M., & Yeh, T. K. (2017). The effects of a collaborative computer-based concept mapping strategy on geographic science performance in junior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Educa-tion, 13(8), 5049-5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a
  15. Chang, C., & Yang, J. C. (2023). Concept mapping in computer-supported learning environment: A bibliometric analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 6678-6695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2043385
  16. Chin, D. B., Dohmen, I. M., Cheng, B. H., Opezzo, M. A., Chase, C. C., & Schwartz, D. L. (2010). Preparing students for future learning with teacha-ble agents. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 649-669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9154-5
  17. Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). Knowledge presented in concept maps: Correlations with conventional knowledge tests. Educational Stud-ies, 28(3), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.643100
  18. Cox, M., Elen, J., & Steegen, A. (2019). Systems thinking in geography: Can high school students do it? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1386413
  19. Davies, M. (2010). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62, 279-301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
  20. Demssie, Y. N., Biemans, H. J. A., Wesselik, R., & Mulder, M. (2023). Fostering students’ systems thinking competence for sustainability by using multiple real-world learning approaches. Environmental Education Research, 29(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2141692
  21. Department of Education (2013, September). Geography programmes of study: Key Stage 3. National curriculum in England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b8699ed915d131105fd16/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Geography.pdf
  22. Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W. J., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2017). Supporting students’ learning and socioscientific reasoning about climate change—The effect of computer-based concept mapping scaffolds. Research in Science Education, 47, 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9493-7
  23. Endreny, A. H. (2010). Urban 5th graders conceptions during a place-based inquiry unit on watersheds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20348
  24. Englebrecht, A. C., Mintzes, J. J., Brown, L. M., & Kelso, P. R. (2005). Probing understanding in physical geology using concept maps and clinical interviews. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.3.263
  25. Erdimez, O., Tan, S., & Zimmerman, R. (2017). The use of concept maps as a tool to measure higher level thinking skills in elementary school science classes. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 5(2), 1-20. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/485988
  26. European Commission (n.d.). Causes of climate change. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/climate-change/causes-climate-change_en
  27. Garciá-Gonzáles, J. A., Gómez-Gonçalves, A., Gómez-Trigueros, I. M., & Sebastián, J. B. (2023). Geographic literacy in Spain with mental maps. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 47(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.2001643
  28. Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., & Khan, A. (2015). The effects of scientific representations on primary students’ development of scientific discourse and conceptual understandings during cooperative contemporary inquiry-science. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.988681
  29. Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). Prior knowledge activation: How different concept mapping tasks lead to substantial differences in cognitive pro-cesses, learning outcomes, and perceived self-efficacy. Instructional Science, 38(4), 417-433. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23372857
  30. Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M P., & Bentsen, P. (2018). A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 598-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1377685
  31. Hay, D. B. (2007). Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601099432
  32. Hay, D. B., Kinchin, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Educa-tion, 33(3), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049251
  33. Heffron, S. G., & Downs, R. M. (2012). Geography for life: National geography standards (2nd ed.). National Council for Geographic Education. https://ncge.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Geography_for_Life_2ndEd.pdf
  34. Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, S.-C. (2021). Facilitating knowledge construction in mobile learning contexts: A bi-directional peer-assessment approach. British Journal of Educational Technologies, 52(1), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13001
  35. International Geographical Union (IGU). (2016, August 24). International charter on geographical education. https://www.igu-cge.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/IGU_2016_eng_ver25Feb2019.pdf
  36. Jeong, S., Elliott, J. B., Feng, Z., & Feldon, D. F. (2022). Understanding complex ecosystems through an agent-based participatory watershed simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31, 691-705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09987-8
  37. Jones, M. (Ed). (2017). The handbook of secondary geography. Geographical Association.
  38. Karkdijk, J., van der Schee, J., & Admiraal, W. F. (2019). Students’ geographical relational thinking when solving mysteries. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2018.1426304
  39. Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800363908
  40. Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012
  41. Lambert, D. (2017). Thinking geographically. In M. Jones (Ed.), The handbook of secondary geography (1st ed.) (pp. 20-29). Geographical Associa-tion.
  42. Lane, R., Carter, J., & Bourke, T. (2019). Concepts, conceptualization, and conceptions in geography. Journal of Geography, 118(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1490804
  43. Leat, D., & Chandler, S. (1996). Using concept mapping in geography teaching. Teaching Geography, 21(3), 108-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23754230
  44. Ma, C., & Lu, X. (2024). The impact of teaching geographical causal diagrams on students’ geographical interrelationship thinking. Journal of Geography, 123(2-3), 32-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2024.2367443
  45. Machado, C. T., & Carvalho, A. A. (2020). Concept mapping: Benefits and challenges in higher education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 68(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1712579
  46. Marzetta, K., Mason, H., & Wee, B. (2018). ‘Sometimes they are fun and sometimes they are not’: Concept mapping with English language acqui-sition (ELA) and gifted/talented (GT) elementary students learning science and sustainability. Educational Sciences, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010013
  47. Mehren, R., & Rempfler, A. (2022). Assessing systems thinking in geography. In T. Bourke, R. Mills, & R. Lane (Eds.), Assessment in geographical education: An international perspective (pp. 31-54). Springer.
  48. Mašterová, V. (2023). Learning and teaching through inquiry with geospatial technologies: A systematic review. European Journal of Geography, 14(3), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.v.mas.14.3.042.054
  49. Moon, B., Hoffman, R. R., Novak, J., & Cañas, A. (2011). Applied concept mapping: Capturing, analysing, and organizing knowledge. CRC Press.
  50. Morfidi, E., Mikropoulos, A., & Rogdaki, A. (2018). Using concept mapping to improve poor readers’ understanding of expository text. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9600-7
  51. Morgan, J. D., Eddy, B., & Coffey, J. W. (2022). Activating student engagement with concept mapping: A web GIS case study. Journal of Geogra-phy in Higher Education, 46(1), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1852200
  52. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualita-tive research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
  53. Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100-1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183265
  54. Nesbit, J. C., & Adescope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430760034
  55. Novak J. D. (2005). Results and implications of a 12-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 35, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3431-4
  56. Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. https://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/pdf/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
  57. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  58. Oberman, R. (2023). Creativity, curiosity and catharsis: Positive emotions in climate change education through picturebooks. Environmental Education Research, 30(11), 2031-2056. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2286940
  59. O’Brien, J. (2002). Concept mapping in geography. Teaching Geography, 27(3), 126-128. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23756499
  60. Oda, K. (2016). Concept maps as a tool to analyse college students’ knowledge of geospatial concepts. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 6(2), 176-189. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/590366
  61. Oliver, K. (2009). An investigation of concept mapping to improve the reading comprehension of science texts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 402-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9157-3
  62. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10: 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
  63. Pontes-Pedrajas, A., & Varo-Martínez, M. (2014). Educative experience of the use of concept mapping in science and environmental teacher training programmes. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0006
  64. Proctor, J. D., & Bernstein, J. (2013). Environmental connections and concept mapping: Implementing a new learning technology at Lewis & Clark College. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0109-0
  65. Rebich, S., & Gautier, C. (2005). Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.355
  66. Reitano, P., & Green, N. C. (2012). The value of concept mapping in developing professional growth in a geography methods course. Internation-al Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 6(2), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.2.160
  67. Renshaw, S., & Wood, P. (2011). Holistic understanding in geography education (HUGE) – An alternative approach to curriculum development and learning at Key Stage 3. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.601656
  68. Roberts, M. (2023). Geography through enquiry. Approaches to teaching and learning in secondary school (2nd ed.). Geographical Association.
  69. Romero, C., Cazorla, M., & Buzón, O. (2017). Meaningful learning using concept maps as a learning strategy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.276
  70. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6%3C569::AID-TEA1%3E3.0.CO;2-M
  71. Schuster, D. A., Filippelli, G. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2008). Secondary students’ subject matter representations of climate change. Journal of Geo-science Education, 56(4), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.5408/secondary_students_subject_mat
  72. Sellmann, D., Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Concept maps in the classroom: A new approach to reveal students’ conceptual change. Journal of Educational Research, 108(3), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.896315
  73. Seow, T. (2016). Reconciling discourse about geography and teaching geography: The case of Singapore pre-service teachers. International Re-search in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1149342
  74. Smithwick, E., Baxter, E., Kim, K., Edel-Malizia, S., Rocco, S., & Blackstock, D. (2018). Interactive videos enhance learning about socio-ecological systems. Journal of Geography, 117(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2017.1374433
  75. Solem, M., & Boehm, R. G. (2018). Research in geography education: Moving from declarations and road maps to actions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2018.1493896
  76. Stevenson, M. P., Hartmeyer, R., & Bentsen, P. (2017). Systematically reviewing the potential of concept mapping technologies to promote self-regulated learning in primary and secondary science education. Educational Research Review, 21, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.002
  77. Stewart, M. (2012). Joined up thinking? Evaluating the use of concept‐mapping to develop complex system learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.534764
  78. Subramaniam, K., & Harrell, P. E. (2015). An analysis of prospective teachers’ knowledge for constructing concept maps. Educational Research, 57(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1050845
  79. Trahorsch, P., Bláha, J. D., & Ryčlová, K. (2022). Conceptual mapping of geography textbook content on the example of the desert biome. Euro-pean Journal of Geography, 13(4), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.p.tra.13.4.045.064
  80. Vasconcelos, C., Ferreira, F., Rolo, A., Moreira, B., & Melo, M. (2010). Improved concept map-based teaching to promote a holistic Earth system view. Geosciences, 10(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10010008
  81. Walshe, N. (2008). Understanding students’ conceptions of sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 537-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802345958
  82. Wehry, S., Monroe-Ossi, H., Cobb, S., & Fountain, C. (2012). Concept mapping strategies: Content, tools and assessment for human geography. Journal of Geography, 111(3), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.604094
  83. Won, M., Krabbe, H., Ley, S. L., Treagust, D. F., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Science teachers’ use of a concept map marking guide as a formative as-sessment tool for the concept of energy. Educational Assessment, 22(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2017.1309277
  84. Yang, H.-T., & Wang, K.-H. (2013). A teaching model for scaffolding 4th Grade students’ scientific explanation writing. Research in Science Educa-tion, 44, 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9392-8
  85. Zimmerman, R., Maker, J. C., Gomez-Arizaga, P. M., & Pease, R. (2011). The use of concept maps in facilitating problem solving in Earth science. Gifted Education International, 27(3), 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941102700305