Vol. 17 No. 2 (2026): Special Issue [SI_TGEO]
Editorial

Teaching Geography for a World in Transition: Navigating Knowledge, Complexity and Change

Neli Heidari
Department of Geography Education, Institute of Geography, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany; European Association of Geographers (EUROGEO), Belgium
Uwe Krause
Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
Susan Caldis
Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University Wallumattagal Campus, Australia
Tine Béneker
Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras
National Technical University of Athens, Greece; European Association of Geographers (EUROGEO), Belgium
Categories

Published 2026-08-18

Keywords

  • Geography education,
  • powerful disciplinary knowledge,
  • socio-scientific issues,
  • climate change education,
  • teacher agency,
  • geospatial technologies,
  • data literacy,
  • artificial intelligence
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Heidari , Neli, Uwe Krause, Susan Caldis, Tine Béneker, and Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras. 2026. “Teaching Geography for a World in Transition: Navigating Knowledge, Complexity and Change”. European Journal of Geography 17 (2):S.373 – S.381. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.n.hei.17.2.373.381.

Abstract

This Special Issue, inspired by the 2026 EUROGEO Conference Geographies in Flux: Navigating a Shifting World Order, examines how geography education can respond to geopolitical realignment, climate change, spatial inequalities and digital disruption. Comprising 24 peer-reviewed contributions by 65 authors from twelve countries, the issue is organised around five interrelated discourses and represents the largest thematic collection on geography education published in EJG to date. Across these, contributions converge on a shared argument: geography education requires both epistemic access to powerful disciplinary knowledge and the capacity to critically examine how such knowledge is produced, represented and contested. Neither curricula, technologies nor assessment practices are neutral; their educational value depends on geography teachers’ professional judgement, conceptual framing and institutional conditions that support reflective, knowledge-rich geography education for a world in transition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alvanides, S., Paulino, J.V. & Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A. (2025). Spatial Humanities and Contemporary Geographical Approaches. European Journal of Geography, 16(1), S.114-S.116. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.si.spat.hum.s.alv.114.116
  2. Bednarz, S. W. (2018). A road map to empower geography education for global understanding. In R. de Miguel González, A. Demirci, & S. W. Bednarz (Eds.), Geography education for global understanding (pp. 247–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77216-5_21
  3. Béneker, T., Bladh, G., & Lambert, D. (2024). Exploring ‘Future three’ curriculum scenarios in practice: Learning from the GeoCapabilities project. The Curriculum Journal, 35(3), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.240
  4. Bevacqua, E., Schleussner, C.-F., & Zscheischler, J. (2025). A year above 1.5 °C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit. Nature Climate Change, 15, 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02246-9
  5. Budke, A. (2016). Potenziale der politischen Bildung im Geographieunterricht [Potentials of political education in geography education]. In A. Budke & M. Kuckuck (Eds.), Politische Bildung im Geographieunterricht (pp. 11–23). Franz Steiner Verlag.
  6. Bueno-Picazo, M., & Tirado-Olivares, S. (2026). Generative AI in Geography Education: Content Creation and Conversational AI-Supported Learning to Promote Environmental Awareness. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.34-S.48. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.m.bue.17.2.034.048
  7. Cheak, S. P., & Seow, T. (2026). Teaching Urban Geography for a World in Transition: Textbook Representations and Students’ Conceptions of Urban Housing in Singapore. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.264-S.282. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.s.che.17.2.264.282
  8. de Miguel González, R. (2024). Powerful geography and the future of geographic education. Dialogues in Human Geography, 14(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206241229219
  9. Dong, Y. (2026). Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 559. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06903-y
  10. Enzmann, J., Jäger, P., & Lindau, A.-K. (2026). Drawing the Boundaries of Controversy: Justifying the Inclusion and Exclusion of Climate Change Perspectives in Geography Teacher Education. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.318-S.337. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.j.enz.17.2.318.337
  11. Eze, E., & Mehren, R. (2026). Stop Disasters Game as a Tool for Teaching Resilience within Geography Education in Uncertain Times. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.221-S.240. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.eze.17.2.221.240
  12. Finn, K., Turner-Adams, H., & Webber, M. (2026). Reorienting Aotearoa New Zealand Secondary School Geography Towards Decolonisation and Indigenisation. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S1-S15. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.k.fin.17.2.S001.S015
  13. Flucher, E., Hennig, P., Wils, T., Raschke, N., & Pettig, F. (2026). Engaging with the Wickedness of Education for Sustainable Development through Multimodal Vignettes in Teacher Education. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.338-S.345. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.flu.17.2.338.345
  14. Georgiou, A., Koutouveli, C., Gazeas, K., Kasapakis, V., & Galani, A. (2026). Misconceptions in Planetary Geography: A Formative Expert Evaluation of a Serious Game Integrating Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.98-S.113. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.a.geo.17.2.098.113
  15. Hammersley, L., McLean, J., Sullivan, C., & Miller, F. (2026). Storying as Repair: Indigenous-led Geography Education on Wiradjuri Country. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.128-S.134. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.l.ham.17.2.128.134
  16. Heidari, N., Schlamelcher, M., & Schmid, P. (2026). Implications for Geography Education from Research on Climate Change Misinformation – A Systematic Review. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.241-S.263. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.n.hei.17.2.241.263
  17. Kamp, A. (2026). Challenging Euro-Centric and Colonial Geography via Decolonial and Indigenised Curriculum: An Australia Case Study. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.85-S.97. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.a.kam.17.2.085.097
  18. Keller, J., & Siegmund, A. (2026). From Theory to Practice: Design Principles for Teaching with Earth Observation Data Using the Key Concept “Spatial Patterns”. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.65-S.84. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.j.kel.17.2.065.084
  19. Klocker, N., Carr, C., & Hammersley, L. (2026). Between Pedagogy and Privacy: Developing Geography Students’ Qualitative Research Skills in the Context of Generative AI. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.135-S.143. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.n.klo.17.2.135.143
  20. Lämmer, S., & Ohl, U. (2026). Evaluating Climate Change Fake News in German Primary Education: The Role of Students’ Conceptions. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S16-S33. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.s.lam.17.2.016.033
  21. Lambert, D., & León, K. (2026). Geography Teaching, Racial Literacy and Truthfulness. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.49-S.64. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.d.lam.17.2.049.064
  22. Lambert, D. & Walshe, N. (2018). How Geography Curricula Tackle Global Issues. In: Demirci, A., Miguel González, R., Bednarz, S. (eds) Geography Education for Global Understanding. (pp. 83–96). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77216-5_7
  23. Mar-Begueria, J., Sebastián-López, M., Kratochvíl, O., & De Miguel González, R. (2026). Climate Change and Geography Education: A Qualitative Study of Expert and Novice Teachers’ Conceptions and Geographical Thinking. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.200-S.220. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.j.mar.17.2.200.220
  24. Maude, A. (2018). Geography and powerful knowledge: A contribution to the debate. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(2), 179–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1320899
  25. Puttick, S. (2025). Geographical education III: Changing climate, changing geographies, changing geographical education? Progress in Human Geography, 49(2), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325241313467
  26. Rawlings Smith, E., & Krause, U. (2026). Reimagining Assessment for a Future 3 Curriculum: Principles and Insights from Geography. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.346-S.358. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.raw.17.2.346.358
  27. Rawlings Smith, E., Mayo-Holloway, C., Healy, G., & Jones, R. (2026). The Importance of Connecting Young People, School Geography and Future Careers in Secondary Education. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.114-S.127. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.smi.17.2.114.127
  28. Robakiewicz, E., Foerster, V., Geiger, K., Schäbitz, F., & Budke, A. (2026). Scientific Data Awareness among Future Geography Educators. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.150-S.168. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.rob.17.2.150.168
  29. Rodriguez-Domenech, M. A., & Aguilar-Cuesta, A. I. (2026). When GIS Succeeds: Fostering Critical Spatial Thinking through Geography Education on Rural Depopulation. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.302-S.317. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.m.ang.17.2.302.317
  30. Simon, M., & Budke, A. (2026). Students’ Perceptions of Stakeholders and Opinions on Democratic Negotiation in Urban Climate-Change Decision-Making. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.169-S.188. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.m.sim.17.2.169.188
  31. Smith, S., Marshall, B., Hodge, P., Daley, L., Wright, S. (2026). Teaching-in-Relation: Reflections from and with Gumbaynggirr Country. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.359-S.372. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.a.sha.17.2.359.372
  32. Standish, A. (2026). Liberal Humanism, Decolonising the Curriculum and the Importance of Epistemic Boundaries. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.189-S.199. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.a.sta.17.2.189.199
  33. UNHCR. (2025). Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends
  34. Wieczorek, L., Höyng, I., & Scholten, N. (2026). Developing Geography Teaching Expertise: Perceived Learning Opportunities Among Expert Teachers in Germany. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.283-S.301. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.l.wie.17.2.283.301
  35. Wils, T., & Schutjens, V. (2026). Experience and Education in the Anthropocene: Conversations with the Non-Human. European Journal of Geography, 17(2), S.144-S.149. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.t.wil.17.2.144.149
  36. World Meteorological Organization. (2026, January 14). WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record [Press release]. https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-confirms-2025-was-one-of-warmest-years-record
  37. Young, M. (2008). From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308969